White collar crimes can result in grave consequences both financially and socially. It is true that offenses like identity theft, embezzlement, or insurance fraud are not violent. However, they mostly lead to the victims’ future sufferings.
The data about white-collar crime points to the potential annual losses of up to $300 billion.
Other sources suggest that the sums could be lower or much higher, ranging from $426 billion to $1.7 trillion every year.
Legal institutions of both levels, federal and state, work to stop these crimes, but people do not realize that state courts play a big role in this domain.
Several things characterize the focus of sentences for white-collar crimes, which are very diverse across the USA.
The main area of concern is among the states where restoration and reformation efforts are more popular and help recover the financial situation.
Elsewhere, the method of punishment has grown more severe and often includes very long prison terms or large fines.
A situation where the same fraud happens in one state can only result in a suspension in another state. In another state, the person would be behind bars for many years, which is not uncommon.
These disparities exist due to local laws, the power of judges to make decisions, and a state’s general legal system.
In this blog, I will explain how various US states address punishments for white-collar crimes. So, keep reading until the end…
Legal Education and Practice in White Collar Crime Cases
As the laws and punishment regulations vary from state to state, the attorneys representing these cases will require more than just general knowledge of the law.
Specifically, they should be able to grasp particular statutes, recognize regional court tendencies, and foresee how local prosecutors might approach the case.
We can attribute this kind of legal work to the individuals who specialize in it, either for assembling financial evidence and creating accurate legal claims in cases. Most of these positions generally go to those people with a Juris Doctor degree.
According to Cleveland State University, the first professional degree required to practice law nationwide is a Juris Doctor.
It is not only a prerequisite for state bar admission, but also for individuals representing clients in court. Rather, it is also the basic education for various other tasks outside the court. Nonetheless, even this degree can also train law professionals for various other tasks outside the court.
Legal enthusiasts willing to work on white-collar crime can pursue a Juris Doctor careers degree with a concentration in corporate law, focusing on their future job.
Due to their instruction, they can easily be expected to manage not only the courtroom but also activities such as reviewing contracts, following paper trails, and identifying compliance issues.
Can Sentences for White Collar Crimes Vary by Jurisdiction?
Sentencing structures are influenced by a range of factors, including:
- The financial loss involved
- Whether the crime involved a position of trust
- Whether the defendant has a prior record
In some states, prosecutors are more likely to recommend alternatives to incarceration for first-time offenders, especially if restitution is offered.
Other states don’t weigh repayment as heavily and pursue tougher penalties even after reimbursing the victims.
Judges also play a significant role. States with more rigid sentencing guidelines may limit a judge’s ability to reduce penalties.
In contrast, other states allow for more flexibility, meaning two similar cases could have very different outcomes based solely on location.
Defense attorneys must consider these realities from the beginning of a case.
An NCBI study states that most people feel that individuals or companies committing white collar crimes are given leniency.
Governments usually offer them some deals to escape criminal charges. Fines or penalties can impact how citizens perceive the legal system’s legitimacy.
Are Sentencing Disparities In White Collar Crimes Challenged On Appeal?
In some cases, defense attorneys file appeals arguing that a sentence was disproportionate or inconsistent with similar cases.
However, success varies. Appellate courts often defer to the trial judge’s discretion unless there’s a clear error or violation of sentencing guidelines.
The Influence of State Laws on Plea Bargains
A recent example of how plea bargains are a common resolution in white-collar cases is that of Lisa Schiff, the art advisor of popular celebrities, including Leonardo DiCaprio.
According to the information provided, she stole $6.5 million from customers. Additionally, she also faced charges of wire fraud in connection with purchasing and selling 55 artworks, as part of her guilty plea.
The way the plea bargains are made depends mostly on that of the state-specific legal practices.
In some states, the defendant is encouraged to decide early on through the services he gets of reduced charges or lighter sentences.
Some others limit how and to what extent the prosecutor can be lenient, besides the defendant’s cooperation in this case.
Courts that face the problem of too many cases, use plea bargains and hence don’t have to deal with most of the cases in the courtroom.
On the contrary, if in a smaller jurisdiction, prosecutors may have the opportunity to negotiate fewer cases and finally take them to trial.
These different views show their influence on an ongoing legal process and possible strategies that can be formed.
Plea deals are also criticized in some US states. These criticisms have led to bans on plea bargains for some years in Alaska and El Paso, Texas.
Alaska banned it from 1975 to 1993, which increased the number of trials in the state. El Paso implemented the ban from 1978 to 1984, leading to 2 times the trial rate and a 250% increase in backlog.
Can You Reverse Plea Bargains in White Collar Cases After Sentencing?
It’s rare but possible. A plea bargain may be challenged if it was made under duress, without full disclosure, or if a key term was violated. Some states have more rigid rules for setting aside guilty pleas, so success depends on both the legal issue and jurisdiction.
White-Collar Crime and Mandatory Minimum Sentences
People often associate mandatory minimums with drug offenses. Let me give you a small example!
In March 2024, the US Supreme Court said that thousands of drug offenders would not be able to seek shorter sentences. The justices ruled in favor of the 2018 criminal justice reform law.
Although usually associated with drug offenses, there’s a growing number of states that have applied them to economic crimes as well. These laws remove discretion from judges and sometimes limit the effectiveness of plea deals.
For example, a mandatory minimum sentence may apply regardless of mitigating factors if a fraud conviction involves a financial loss over a certain threshold.
Critics argue that these policies overlook individual circumstances, especially in cases where the accused may have been pressured by employers.
Supporters, however, claim mandatory sentencing creates consistency and fairness in punishment.
Whether or not these laws are applied and how rigidly they are depends on the state.
Attorneys working across state lines often have to adapt quickly, as a strategy built for flexibility may fall apart under a mandatory sentencing structure.
Can White-Collar Crime Judges Reduce Mandatories Under Certain Conditions?
Well, yes! It is true for the citizens of some states. Judges, let’s say, may be able to exclude mandatory minimums from the sentence if the defendant provides extensive cooperation to the investigating authority.
At the same time, not all regions of the US grant such competence to their judges, and even if they do, such departures are usually accompanied by a detailed justification.
Although white-collar crime does not always involve the use of violence, the legal ramifications are usually just as severe, if not more so, and also quite unpredictable.
Each state’s determination of punishment varies greatly, depending on local laws, courtroom culture, and public attitudes.
These differences impact everything from plea bargains to mandatory minimums and what happens after the conviction.
Knowledge about these disparities is very important for legal professionals. It allows them to develop stronger case strategies and achieve better results for clients facing complex financial charges.
Whether it’s a case of embezzlement or a fraud investigation, knowing how the state’s laws affect the whole process can lead to a positive impact.
Read Also:
